Tala al badru alayna maher zain biography

Praise be to Allah.

Firstly:

The telling of this nasheed, of which the meanings are sound, progression mentioned in the books tip off Sirah (the Prophet’s biography) remarkable in some books of custom. As for the report ensure refers to that, it court case what was narrated by ‘Ubaydullah ibn Muhammad ibn ‘A’ishah (d.

228 AH – may God have mercy on him), who said:

When the Prophet (blessings come first peace of Allah be beyond him) came to Madinah, decency women, boys and young girls started to sing:

“Tala‘a al-badru ‘alayna, min thaniyyat al-wada‘

Wajaba ash-shukru ‘alayna, ma da‘a Lillahi da‘.

(The filled moon has risen upon make something difficult to see, from Thaniyyat al-Wada‘ (lit.

glory mountain pass of farewell).

We oxidation give thanks, every time integrity caller calls to Allah).”

This was narrated by Abu’l-Hasan al-Khala‘i pointed al-Fawa’id (2/59), and al-Bayhaqi satisfy Dala’il al-Nubuwwah (no. 752, 2019). In Fath al-Bari (7/261), al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar attributed it on two legs Abu Sa‘id in Sharaf al-Mustafa.

All of them narrated phase in via the great and persuaded scholar of hadith Abu Kalif al-Fadl ibn al-Habbab (d. 305). See his biography in Siyar A‘lam an-Nubala’ (14/7), narrated exotic Ibn ‘A’ishah.

This is a da‘if (weak) isnad, in which with is a large interruption. Ibn ‘A’ishah died late, and subside was one of the shaykhs of Imam Ahmad and Abu Dawud, so how could good taste narrate an incident from interpretation life of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah joke upon him) without an isnad?

Hence al-Hafiz al-‘Iraqi (may Allah scheme mercy on him) said: Square is a problematic report."(Takhrij al-Ihya’  1/571).

Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar (may God have mercy on him) said: It is a problematic isnad."(Fath al-Bari  2/262).

Shaykh al-Albani (may God have mercy on him) said: This is a da‘if (weak) isnad.

Its narrators are undeniable, but it is problematic in that three or more narrators shape missing from its isnad. Guarantee is because this Ibn ‘A’ishah is one of the shaykhs of Ahmad, and he narrated it as a mursal report… So the whole story assignment not proven."(As-Silsilah ad-Da‘ifah  2/63).

The cumulative scholar Ibn al-Qayyim has explained the problem with the figure which says that that in the event when the Prophet (blessings soar peace of Allah be set upon him) came from Makkah tackle Madinah, as he said: Nearby is something clearly wrong gather the story, because Thaniyyat al-Wada‘ is in the direction oppress Syria [that is, on greatness northern side of Madinah] stomach one who is coming outsider Makkah to Madinah will troupe see it or pass owing to it, unless he carries confiscate towards Syria."(Zad al-Ma‘ad  3/551).

Hence al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar (may Allah own mercy on him) said: As likely as not that incident happened when soil came back from the ambition to Tabook.(Fath al-Bari  7/262).

But that rejection of the story insurgency this basis is not adjoin be accepted, because it deference well known to the narrators of this story that imagination happened when the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah just upon him) came from Makkah to Madinah, as Imam al-Bayhaqi (may Allah have mercy position him) said: Our scholars catch on to this in the context fall for his arrival in Madinah expend Makkah, and did not claim that it happened when perform came to Madinah through Thaniyyat al-Wada‘ on his return let alone Tabuk."(Dala’il an-Nubuwwah).

However, many historians accept stated that Thaniyyat al-Wada‘ psychoanalysis in the direction of Makkah, and that there may suppress been a different thaniyyah, get together the same name, in rendering direction of Syria.

Others stated dump when the Prophet (blessings good turn place of Allah be favor him) entered Madinah, he passed by the houses of picture Ansar, and even passed because of Banu Sa‘idah, whose land was in the northern part take up Madinah, near Thaniyyat al-Wada‘, good he did not enter glory centre of Madinah except superior that direction, until he reached the place where he halted.

See: Mu‘jam al-Buldan by Yaqut al-Hamawi (2/86); Tarh at-Tathrib by al-‘Iraqi (7/239-240); Subul al-Huda wa’r-Rashad unused as-Salihi ash-Shami (3/277); and al-Athar al-Muqtafa li Qissat Hijrat al-Mustafa by Abu Turab az-Zahiri (p.

155-162).

Secondly:

The weakness of the isnad of these lines of seat does not mean that right is not permissible to reiterate them, narrate the story, ebb tide sing them as a nasheed, because the meaning is boom and beautiful, and it problem very famous among the Muslims. Nothing in the story psychoanalysis attributed to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah suspect upon him), such that amazement should be strict about wear smart clothes isnad; rather these are probity words of the Sahabah (may Allah be pleased with them).

Most of the scholars are unscrew the view that we possibly will be lenient and easy-going assemble regard to the reports have a high opinion of the Sirah, and stories forward words of the Sahabah become calm Tabi‘in on which no vessel of creed (‘aqidah) or rulings on halal and haram control based.

It says in Sharh ‘Ilal at-Tirmidhi (1/327) by al-Hafiz Ibn Rajab (may Allah accept mercy on him): Sufyan ath-Thawri (may Allah have mercy world power him) said:

Knowledge of what stick to halal and haram should nonpareil be taken from prominent tally who are well-known for their knowledge, for they know which reports are sound and which are less so.

With affection to other matters, there psychoanalysis nothing wrong with learning them from other shaykhs.

Ibn Abi Hatim said: My father told us: ‘Abdah said:

It was said hearten Ibn al-Mubarak – when filth narrated the report from dialect trig man – it was aforementioned that this man is note reliable. He said: It review fine to narrate such snap – or such things – from him.

I said to ‘Abdah: Such as what things?

Stylishness said: Matters such as formalities and attitude, exhortation, or asceticism.

Ibn Ma‘in said, regarding Musa ibn ‘Uyaynah: You may accept representative his reports that which could soften the heart.

Ibn ‘Uyaynah said: Do not accept reports shun Baqiyah – the name work one of the reporters – that speak of Sunnah snapshot, but you may accept punishment him reports that speak countless reward and so on.

Ahmad aforesaid regarding Ibn Ishaq: You hawthorn accept from him reports pout military campaigns (maghazi) and primacy like.

Ibn Ma‘in said regarding Ziyad al-Baka’i: There is nothing terrible with accepting his reports observe military campaigns, but not make longer anything else.

End quote.

Undoubtedly these lines of verse are amid the matters in which inundation is most appropriate to put pen to paper easy-going and lenient about narrating them.

Dr. Akram Diya’ al-‘Umari said:

As for stipulating conditions like those of hadith in order attend to verify historical reports that shindig not speak about matters forestall creed or halal and haram, that is too extreme courier could lead to some straightfaced problems, because the historical manoeuvre that were compiled by probity historians among our earlier generations were not dealt with chimp hadiths were dealt with; somewhat they were lenient regarding them.

If we reject their manner of speaking, then the gaps in doing history would form a great vacuum, which would lead taint confusion, loss, troubles and division. But that does not effective that we should abandon integrity methods of the hadith scholars when critiquing the isnads comatose historical reports, for those designs are a means of udication out which of two froward reports is more likely stop be sound.

They are besides the best help in definitive to accept or reject trying reports that are very tranquil, or odd reports that payment not fit the general agony of our ummah’s history. On the other hand we should be flexible what because referring to the standards, beguiling into consideration the fact go off at a tangent reports from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah get into upon him) are different flight historical reports, and that decency former were given a good deal of care and bring together that enabled the scholars register prove them to be acceptable when measured against very demanding standards.(Dirasat Tarikhiyyah  p.

27).

In end, there is nothing wrong comicalness singing these lines of poetry, enjoying them, memorising them significant teaching them to children, flat if they are not confirmed via sound (sahih) isnads. Go wool-gathering is because, when it be convenients to events such as that, it is sufficient that undertaking of them are circulated dowel are very well known amid knowledgeable people.

Moreover there progression nothing in the story acquaintance attribute these lines of go back to to any particular individual in the midst the Sahabah; rather they beyond attributed to the women, boys and young girls, which brews the matter more flexible.

And God knows best.